"Science" is derived from the scire – "to know".
Each of us should know what we are eating, how it was produced, what impact it has on our health.
"Agroecology, not the mechanistic and
blind paradigm of industrial agriculture, is the truly scientific
approach to food production."
The knowledge we need for growing food is knowledge of
biodiversity and living seed, of living soil and the soil food web, of
interaction between different species in the agroecosystem and of
different seasons. Farmers have been the experts in these fields, as
have ecological scientists who study the evolution of microorganisms,
plants and animals, the ecological web and the soil food web.
In industrial agriculture the knowledge of living systems
is totally missing since industrial agriculture was externally driven by
using war chemicals as inputs for agriculture. Soil was defined as an
empty container for holding synthetic fertilizers, plants were defined
as machines running on external inputs. This meant substituting the
ecological functions and services that nature and farmers can provide
through renewal of soil fertility, pest and weed control, and seed
improvement. But it also implied ignorance of the destruction of the
functions by the toxic chemicals applied to agriculture.
This complex knowledge of interacting, self-organizing,
self-maintaining, self-renewing and self-evolving systems that farmers
have had is now being confirmed through the latest in ecology. At the
agricultural systems level, agroecology, not the mechanistic and blind
paradigm of industrial agriculture, is the truly scientific approach to
food production.
At the level of organisms, epigenetics and the new
knowledge that cells are in constant communication with each other is
leading to the emergence of a new paradigm of life as communication and
intelligence. Living systems are not dead matter, assembled like a
machine.
Yet in recent times only one kind of
knowledge, the Mechanistic Reductionist paradigm based on seeing the
world as a machine, and reduction of a system its parts, has been
elevated to the status of science.
The emerging sciences of complexity and connectedness
expose the oceans of ignorance in which the mechanistic fundamentalism
is steeped. Because living systems are self-organized complexity—and not
machines— knowledge of a small fragmented part in isolation of its
relationships with the rest of the system, translates into not-knowing.
This epistemic violence is now being combined with the
violence of corporate interests to viciously attack all scientific
traditions, including those that have evolved from within Western
Science and transcended the mechanistic world view.
Industrial-scale farming, in this way, is actually becoming anti-science.
No where is this more evident than in how reductionism has
been used to colonise the seed. Seed is self organized intelligence –
it reproduces, it multiplies, and it constantly evolves. Farmers,
specially women, have combined their intelligence with the intelligence
of the seed, and through breeding as co-creation, they have domesticated
wild plants, increased diversity to adapt to diverse climates and
cultures. Additionally, they have improved both nutrition and taste as
well as increased resilience, which is the evolutionary potential of the
seed. Seeds have been improved on the basis of ecological and social
criteria.
The rhetoric for taking over food systems and seed supply
is always based on "Improved Seed." But what is not mentioned is that
industrial seeds are only "improved" in the context of higher dependence
on chemicals, and more control by corporations.
The latest in the anti-scientific discourse of industrial agriculture is by reducing everything to "GMOs."
Genetic Engineering is used to redefine seed as a corporate
"invention" to claim patents and collect royalties. Farmers suicides in
the cotton belt of India are directly related to the extraction of
super-profits from farmers as royalty. And this is illegal since
Monsanto never had a patent on Bt cotton.
It is claimed the GMOs will increase food production but the technology does not increase yields.
It is claimed that genetic engineering is a precise
technology. This is false for four primary reasons. First, genetic
engineering is based on the false assumption that one gene gives rise to
one trait. Second, it is so imprecise that antibiotic resistance marker
genes have to be added to even know if the gene was actually introduced
in the cell of the plant and genes from virulent viruses have to be
added to promote the trait being introduced. Third, because the genes
come from unrelated organisms, and include bacterial and viral genes,
there are unknown impacts on the organism and the ecosystem in which it
is introduced. This is why there are multidisciplinary sciences involved
in Biosafety, and an international UN law to regulate GMOs for their
Biosafety impact called the Cartagena Protocol to the Convention on the
Conservation of Biodiversity.
"It is precisely on the denial of
intelligence of humans and other species that the edifice of mechanistic
reductionism is based."
Fourth, the anti-scientific claim that GMOs are accurate
and selection and conventional breeding are inaccurate ignores the
intelligence of plants and of farmers which is at play in evolution. In
fact, the emergence of antibiotic resistance indicates the intelligence
of bacteria to evolve under the pressure of antibiotics. Bacteria, as
intelligent beings, are remaking themselves in response to antibiotics.
The emergence of superpests resistant to Bt toxin in plants, and
superweeds resistant to Roundup with the spread of Roundup Ready GMOs
indicates the intelligence of insects and plants to remake themselves
under the pressure of toxins associated with GMOs which are designed to
kill them. But it is precisely on the denial of intelligence of humans
and other species that the edifice of mechanistic reductionism is based.
"Intelligence" is based on the Latin inter legere –
"to choose". From the slime mold and bacteria, to plants and animals,
including humans, intelligence is the choice we make to evolve in order
to respond to changing contexts. Life is a cognitive system, with
communication constantly taking place in a network on non-separable
patterns of relationship. Living beings innovate all the time to deal
with environmental challenges that face them. As evolutionary biologist
Richard Lewontin says, "The characteristic of a living object is that it
reacts to external stimuli rather than being passively propelled by
them. An organisms life is constant mid-course corrections."
As a species, we as humans are falling behind the slime
mold and bacteria to make an intelligent response to the environmental
threats we face. And our intelligence is being thwarted by the false
construction of the living Earth as dead matter, to be exploited
limitlessly for human control, domination and greed.
The mid-course correction we need is to move beyond the
mechanistic paradigm, and beyond exploitation which is manipulating not
just living organisms, but knowledge itself.
It is claimed that the Bt toxin in GMOs degrades, but it
has been found to survive in the blood of pregnant women and fetuses. It
is claimed that Roundup and Roundup Ready crops are safe for humans
because humans do not have the shikimate pathway.
This is outright violence against science. Ninety percent of the
genetic information in our body is not human but bacterial.
Out of the
600 trillion cells in our body only 6 trillion are human, the rest are
bacterial. And bacteria have the shikimate pathway. The bacteria in our
gut are being killed by Roundup leading to serious disease epidemics,
from increasing intestinal disorders to neurological problems such as
the increase in occurrence of autism and Alzheimers. The soil, the gut
and our brain are one interconnected biome – violence to one part
triggers violence in the entire inter-related system. The US Centers for
Disease Control data shows
that on current trends one in two children in the US could be autistic
in a few decades. It is not an intelligent species that destroys its own
future because of a distorted and manipulated definition of science.
As Einstein had observed: "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe."
