Harvard and other major American universities are working through British 
hedge funds  and European financial speculators to 
buy or lease vast areas of  African farmland in deals, some of which may force many thousands of  people off their land, according to a new study.
    Institutions including Harvard and Vanderbilt reportedly use hedge  funds to buy land in deals that may force farmers out. These  universities are reportedly using endowment funds to make deals that  'drive up food prices and increase the risks of climate change' and may  force thousands from their land in Africa.  Researchers say foreign investors are  profiting from "land grabs" that often fail to deliver the promised  benefits of jobs and economic development, and can lead to environmental  and social problems in the poorest countries in the world.
The new report on land acquisitions in seven African countries  suggests that 
Harvard, Vanderbilt and many other US colleges with large  endowment funds have invested heavily in African land in the past few  years. Much of the money is said to be channelled through London-based  Emergent asset management, which runs one of 
Africa's largest land acquisition funds, run by former JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs currency dealers.
Researchers at the California-based Oakland Institute think that  Emergent's clients in the US may have invested up to $500m in some of  the most fertile land in the expectation of making 25% returns.
Emergent said the deals were handled responsibly. "Yes, university  endowment funds and pension funds are long-term investors," a spokesman  said. "We are 
investing  in African agriculture and setting up businesses and employing people.  We are doing it in a responsible way … The amounts are large. They can  be 
hundreds of millions of dollars. This is not landgrabbing. We want to  make the land more valuable. Being big makes an impact, economies of  scale can be more productive."
Chinese and Middle Eastern firms have previously been identified as  "grabbing" large tracts of land in developing countries to grow cheap  food for home populations, but western funds are behind many of the  biggest deals, says the Oakland institute, an advocacy research group.
The company that manages Harvard's investment funds declined to  comment. "It is Harvard management company policy not to discuss  investments or investment strategy and therefore I cannot confirm the  report," said a spokesman. Vanderbilt also declined to comment.
Oakland said investors overstated the benefits of the deals for the  communities involved. "Companies have been able to create complex layers  of companies and subsidiaries to avert the gaze of weak regulatory  authorities. Analysis of the contracts reveal that many of the deals  will provide few jobs and will force many thousands of people off the  land," said Anuradha Mittal, Oakland's director.
In Tanzania, the memorandum of understanding between the local  government and US-based farm development corporation AgriSol Energy,  which is working with Iowa University, stipulates that the two main  locations – Katumba and Mishamo – for their project are refugee  settlements holding as many as 162,000 people that will have to be  closed before the $700m project can start. The refugees have been  farming this land for 40 years.
In Ethiopia, a process of "villagisation" by the government is moving  tens of thousands of people from traditional lands into new centres  while big land deals are being struck with international companies.
The largest land deal in South Sudan, where as much as 9% of the land  is said by Norwegian analysts to have been bought in the last few  years, was negotiated between a Texas-based firm, Nile Trading and  Development and a local co-operative run by absent chiefs. The 49-year  lease of 400,000 hectares of central Equatoria for around $25,000  (£15,000) allows the company to exploit all natural resources including  oil and timber. The company, headed by former US Ambassador Howard  Eugene Douglas, says it intends to apply for UN-backed carbon credits  that could provide it with millions of pounds a year in revenues.
In Mozambique, where up to 7m hectares of land is potentially  available for investors, western hedge funds are said in the report to  be working with South Africans businesses to buy vast tracts of forest  and farmland for investors in Europe and the US. The contracts show the  government will waive taxes for up to 25 years, but few jobs will be  created.
"No one should believe that these investors are there to feed  starving Africans, create jobs or improve food security," said Obang  Metho of Solidarity Movement for New Ethiopia. "These agreements – many  of which could be in place for 99 years – do not mean progress for local  people and will not lead to food in their stomachs. These deals lead  only to dollars in the pockets of corrupt leaders and foreign  investors."
"The scale of the land deals being struck is shocking", said Mittal.  "The conversion of African small farms and forests into a  natural-asset-based, high-return investment strategy can drive up food  prices and increase the risks of climate change.
Research by the World Bank and others suggests that nearly 60m  hectares – an area the size of France – has been bought or leased by  foreign companies in Africa in the past three years.
"Most of these deals are characterised by a lack of transparency,  despite the profound implications posed by the consolidation of control  over global food markets and agricultural resources by financial firms,"  says the report.
"We have seen cases of speculators taking over agricultural land  while small farmers, viewed as squatters, are forcibly removed with no  compensation," said Frederic Mousseau, policy director at Oakland, said:  "This is creating insecurity in the global food system that could be a  much bigger threat to global security than terrorism. More than one  billion people around the world are living with hunger. The majority of  the world's poor still depend on small farms for their livelihoods, and  speculators are taking these away while promising progress that never  happens."
© 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited