Wednesday, November 16, 2016

REPORT REVEALS POISON IN US FOOD - TAKE ACTION NOW



This week, Food Democracy Now! and the Detox Project are releasing a a groundbreaking 26-page report that shows conclusive evidence that America’s food supply is contaminated with alarming levels of glyphosate residues. As the main active ingredient in Monsanto’s bestselling weedkiller Roundup, both Roundup and glyphosate have been linked to a host of negative health impacts, including birth defects, reproductive problems, lowered immune response, irritable bowel syndrome, harmful imbalances in gut microflora and cancer.

In this report we detail the latest independent peer reviewed science that conclusively shows that Roundup and glyphosate are significantly more harmful at much lower levels than previously imaged and outline the significant flaws in the U.S. regulatory system that has left the American public exposed to high levels of a toxic chemical, which last year the World Health Organization linked to cancer.

We need your help to demand that the EPA Inspector General’s office launch a non-partisan investigation to glyphosate’s likely negative human health impacts reviewing the latest scientific research; halt the use of Roundup on important food crops and uncover possible misconduct between U.S. regulators and the chemical industry they are supposed to regulate.
Tell the EPA to keep Glyphosate off our plates! It’s time to launch a full investigation into the human health effects of Monsanto’s Roundup and glyphosate-based weedkillers to protect the health of the American public and our nation's children. 
Every voice counts!


Using an independent FDA-registered laboratory, scientists found alarming levels of glyphosate residues in these popular American food products, including General Mills’ Cheerios and Honey Nut Cheerios, Kellogg’s Corn Flakes, Raisin Bran, Special K and Frosted Flakes, and PepsiCo’s Doritos, Ritz Crackers and Stacy’s Simply Naked Pita Chips, as part of a unique testing project designed to reveal pesticide exposure at real world levels.

Even more disturbing is that the highest glyphosate levels were found in General Mills’ Cheerios, one of the first foods that American mothers commonly feed their young children when they begin eating solid foods. Glyphosate residues for Cheerios, measured at 1,125.3 parts per billion (ppb), were simply off the chart and much higher than the 28 other food products tested.

New scientific evidence shows that possible harm from glyphosate can begin at much lower levels, even as low as 0.1 ppb. Credible independent peer reviewed studies published in 2014 and 2015 found that rats exposed to 0.1 ppb of Roundup and 0.05 ppb of glyphosate could cause severe organ damage and alter gene function of over 4,000 genes in the livers and kidneys of rats. These groundbreaking new findings should be a wake-up call for all Americans regarding unacceptable levels of pesticide residues in our nation’s food.
 Please join us in holding EPA regulators accountable!

Why should you be concerned and why Food Democracy Now! decided to take action:


This report comes after more than a year and a half investigation into the massive U.S. regulatory failures that have left the American public not only in the dark about glyphosate contamination in our food supply, but also regularly exposed to levels of this toxic weedkiller that emerging science is now demonstrating to be more hazardous to human health than previously thought.

New independent research shows that harm from Monsanto’s Roundup and glyphosate-based herbicides can begin at much lower levels than previously imagined and with the modern understanding that endocrine disrupting chemicals can disrupt basic hormone functions at ultra-low levels, U.S. regulations must reflect latest scientific research to protect our health and that of our children. In addition, the fact that glyphosate is also patented as an antimicrobial agent has raised alarm among scientists who believe that low level exposure to glyphosate can negatively disrupt beneficial bacteria in our stomachs like it does in the soil, leading to whole host of human health problems that doctors are just beginning to understand.

U.S. Regulators Asleep at the Wheel Regarding Glyphosate Exposure and Harm to Human Health

For the past 20 plus years, U.S. regulators have refused to test for glyphosate residues even though it’s the most widely used weedkiller in the U.S. and its use has exploded in the past 2 decades due to the widespread adoption of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready GMO crops. Today more than 300 million pounds of glyphosate-based weedkillers are sprayed across U.S. farmland, public parks and lawns and home gardens. Use of Roundup has become so pervasive that 75% of rainwater samples in the Midwest tested positive for glyphosate.

Last year, on March 20, 2015, 17 leading scientific experts from the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) declared glyphosate “probably carcinogenic to humans”, which should have served as a call-to-action for U.S. regulators. Instead, the U.S. EPA issued a final report that not surprisingly agreed with Monsanto’s rebuttal, which called the IARC’s report “junk science.” This is an outrage and this type of regulatory corruption has to end today, which is why
 Food Democracy Now! is calling for an investigation of possible regulatory misconduct at the EPA by the EPA’s inspector general.

Regulatory Collusion Puts Human Health at Risk


Currently, U.S. regulators allow what is considered a very high level of daily glyphosate residue in America’s food. In the U.S., the EPA set the daily acceptable intake (ADI) limit at 1.75 parts per million (ppm) per kilogram of bodyweight per day in the U.S., versus a more responsible level at 0.3 ppm in the European Union based on their review of the same studies submitted to the EPA. This report uses original documents from the EU and EPA regulatory approvals of glyphosate to expose Monsanto's convenient lie that glyphosate and Roundup is perfectly safe.

Unfortunately, the regulatory agencies in the U.S. have been captured by the industry’s they’re supposed to regulate. The U.S. government’s continued reliance on Monsanto-funded science and their refusal to consider the most current independent peer reviewed scientific research is alarming. Especially considering the fact that the regulators at the FDA are currently reviewing a 15-year re-approval of Monsanto’s Roundup and glyphosate-based herbicides based on woefully out-of-date science.

It’s time to take our government back and end the corporate corruption of our laws that are supposed to protect the American public.


Remember, democracy is like muscle, if you don’t use it you lose it.

Thanks for participating in food democracy,

Dave Murphy
Founder / Executive Director
Food Democracy Now!


What else you’ll find in this reportGlyphosate: Unsafe on Any Plate!

  1. Levels of Glyphosate Residues found in popular American foods. 
  2. A summary of what the latest independent scientific research says about the safety of Roundup and glyphosate. 
  3. A detailed analysis of why the current U.S. EPA's acceptable daily intake (ADI) is much too high. 
  4. Evidence that regulators in Europe considered the U.S. ADI to be “very high” and “far outside the range” of what chemical companies other than Monsanto submitted for safety approvals. 
  5. Scientific evidence that refutes Monsanto’s claim that glyphosate does not accumulate. 
  6. A call to action – to investigate regulatory collusion at the EPA, end the practice of pre-harvest spraying of Roundup on food crops and a call to release all the scientific data submitted by Monsanto for safety assessments.

Saturday, October 29, 2016

NYT HIRES INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS AFTER 20 YEARS RE:GMOs

G.M.O.s Were Supposed
to Increase Crop Yields

Canada and Western Europe grow different varieties of rapeseed (canola), but Canadian farmers have adopted genetically modified seed, while European farmers have not. Still, the long-term yield trend for both areas is up.
hectograms per hectare*
50,000
Rapeseed crop yield
40,000
Trend line
30,000
G.M.O.s not used
WESTERN EUROPE
Annual figures
20,000
G.M.O.s used
CANADA
Genetically modified varieties
introduced in North America
0
’85
’90
’95
’00
’05
’10
’14
The New York Times|Sources: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | Note: Western Europe is France, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Austria.
In the last three decades, corn yields in Western Europe have largely kept pace with those in the United States.
120,000
hectograms per hectare*
G.M.O.s used
UNITED STATES
Corn crop yield
100,000
80,000
G.M.O.s not used
WESTERN EUROPE
Genetically modified varieties introduced in the U.S.
40,000
20,000
0
’85
’90
’95
’00
’05
’10
’14
The New York Times|Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | Note: Western Europe is France, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Austria.
Meanwhile, in the last decade sugar beet yields in Western Europe have increased more sharply than those in the United States.
1,000,000
hectograms per hectare*
G.M.O.s not used
Sugar beet crop yield
WESTERN EUROPE
800,000
600,000
G.M.O.s used
UNITED STATES
400,000
Genetically modified varieties introduced in the U.S.
200,000
0
’05
’10
’14
The New York Times|Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | Note: Genetic modification penetration reached 95 percent by 2010, according to the United States Dept. of Agriculture.

G.M.O.s Were Supposed
to Lessen Pesticide Use

Manufacturers also said that genetically modified crops would reduce the need for pesticides. In France, where G.M.O.s are not permitted, pesticide use has significantly declined.
70
thousand metric tons of active ingredient
Pesticide use in France
60
50
40
FUNGICIDES
30
HERBICIDES
20
10
INSECTICIDES
0
’96
’00
’05
’10
’13
The New York Times|Source: Union of Industries of Plant Protection (France)
But in the United States, while the use of insect- and fungus-killing chemicals has declined, farmers are using even more weed killers.
600
million pounds
Pesticide use in the United States
500
400
HERBICIDES
300
200
100
INSECTICIDES AND FUNGICIDES
0
’92
’96
’00
’04
’08
’12
The New York Times|Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Much of the growth in the use of weed killers has come in Monsanto’s Roundup, in which the active ingredient is glyphosate.
percentage of acres treated
350
Herbicides applied to corn in the United States
300
250
METOLACHLOR
ACETOCHLOR
200
ATRAZINE
150
100
OTHERS
50
GLYPHOSATE
0
’90
’95
’00
’05
’10
’14
The New York Times|Source: U.S.D.A. National Agricultural Statistics Service

ORGANICS REMOVE ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR CHEMS

Hormone hacking

Hormone hacking


Summary

Glyphosate and Roundup have been shown to be endocrine (hormone) disruptors in experiments. Endocrine disruption in humans is thought to contribute to some cancers, birth defects, reproductive problems such as infertility, and developmental problems in foetuses, babies, and children.
Under European law, pesticides that disrupt hormones (“endocrine disrupting chemicals” or EDCs) are not allowed to be marketed.1 Governments recognize the threat posed by endocrine disruption, which are believed to be implicated in serious diseases, such as cancer, reproductive and developmental problems, and birth defects. These effects are thought to result from very low doses over a long period of exposure or from exposures in critical windows of development, such as foetal development in the womb.

The Glyphosate Task Force (GTF) website, which is run by pesticide companies, cites the German government’s view that glyphosate is not an endocrine disruptor.
2
But this is seriously misleading. On the contrary, studies from the peer-reviewed independent literature show that both glyphosate and the commercial formulations, such as Roundup, are endocrine disruptors.
The endocrine disrupting effect of glyphosate and its commercial formulations is their most insidious and worrying toxic effect. This is because EDCs do not function like normal poisons, where a higher dose gives greater toxicity. Often, endocrine disruptive effects are seen at lower doses but not at higher doses.3,4 The studies conducted by industry for regulatory purposes use relatively high doses and are not able to detect these effects.
Peer-reviewed study findings include the following:
  • Glyphosate herbicide altered hormone levels in female catfish and decreased egg viability. The study concluded that the herbicide is harmful to catfish reproduction.5
  • Roundup disrupted production of the steroid hormone progesterone in mouse cells.6
  • Glyphosate herbicide was a potent EDC in rats, causing disturbances in reproductive development after exposure during puberty.7
  • In an in vitro experiment in human cells, glyphosate herbicides prevented the action of androgens, the masculinizing hormones, at levels up to 800 times lower than glyphosate residue levels allowed in some GM crops used for animal feed in the USA. DNA damage was found in human cells treated with glyphosate herbicides at these levels. Glyphosate herbicides disrupted the action and formation of estrogens, the feminizing hormones. The first toxic effects were found at the low dose of 5 ppm and the first endocrine disruption at 0.5 ppm – 800 times less than the 400 ppm level authorized for some animal feeds.8
  • Roundup herbicide at environmentally relevant exposure levels (down to 0.00023% glyphosate dilution of the commercial formulation) caused the dysregulation of genes in human breast cancer cells grown in the laboratory in vitro. Of the 1,550 genes analyzed, expression of 680 was either increased or decreased. Roundup was able to replace and work synergistically with estrogen, which is required for growth of the breast cancer cells. This demonstrates the strong potential endocrine disruptive potential of glyphosate in this hormonal system. The authors commented, “There remains an unclear pattern of very complex events following exposure of human cells to low levels of glyphosate, but events surrounding the altered levels of expression of only three genes… out of the entire battery tested, are both complicated and potentially damaging to adult and fetal cells.”9
  • Glyphosate alone increased the proliferation of estrogen-dependent breast cancer cells by estrogenic mechanisms in vitro10 at a level permitted in drinking water in the EU (see “Potentially dangerous levels of glyphosate found in GM soy” for more on this study).
  • An in vivo study of Roundup administered to rats in drinking water diluted to 50ng/L glyphosate equivalence – half of the level permitted in drinking water in the EU11and 14,000 times lower than that permitted in drinking water in the USA12 – resulted in severe organ damage and a trend of increased incidence of mammary tumours in female animals over a 2-year period of exposure. The latter observation of tumours needs to be confirmed in an experiment with larger numbers of rats.13
  • Roundup was an endocrine disruptor through its toxicity to human cells in vitro at levels permitted in drinking water in Australia. The endocrine disruption occurred through a mechanism of toxicity to the cells, making them unable to produce the hormone progesterone. The lowest level consistently found to be toxic was 720ug/L. As the Australian Drinking Water Guideline is set at the relatively high level of 1mg/L (higher than the permitted US levels of 700ug/L or 0.7mg/L), the levels found toxic in the experiment are within the range permitted in Australia.14
Due to the activities of the powerful agrochemical lobby and its allies in government, dispute will continue about how relevant these findings are to humans until more experiments are done in animals using low, presumed safe doses, over a long period of time.
References:
  1. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Off J Eur Union. 2009:1-50.
  2. Glyphosate Task Force. Industry Task Force welcomes important step in the EU review of glyphosate. Glyphosate Facts. 2014. http://www.glyphosate.eu/news/industry-task-force-welcomes-important-step-eu-review-glyphosate.
  3. Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(3):378-455. doi:10.1210/er.2011-1050.
  4. Vom Saal FS, Akingbemi BT, Belcher SM, et al. Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;24:131-138. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.005.
  5. Soso AB, Barcellos LJG, Ranzani-Paiva MJ, et al. Chronic exposure to sub-lethal concentration of a glyphosate-based herbicide alters hormone profiles and affects reproduction of female Jundiá (Rhamdia quelen). Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007;23:308-313.
  6. Walsh LP, McCormick C, Martin C, Stocco DM. Roundup inhibits steroidogenesis by disrupting steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein expression. Env Health Perspect. 2000;108:769-776.
  7. Romano RM, Romano MA, Bernardi MM, Furtado PV, Oliveira CA. Prepubertal exposure to commercial formulation of the herbicide Glyphosate alters testosterone levels and testicular morphology. Arch Toxicol. 2010;84:309-317.
  8. Gasnier C, Dumont C, Benachour N, Clair E, Chagnon MC, Séralini GE. Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines. Toxicology. 2009;262:184-191. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2009.06.006.
  9. Hokanson R, Fudge R, Chowdhary R, Busbee D. Alteration of estrogen-regulated gene expression in human cells induced by the agricultural and horticultural herbicide glyphosate. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007;26:747-752. doi:10.1177/0960327107083453.
  10. Thongprakaisang S, Thiantanawat A, Rangkadilok N, Suriyo T, Satayavivad J. Glyphosate induces human breast cancer cells growth via estrogen receptors. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;59:129-136. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.057.
  11. Council of the European Union. Council directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Off J Eur Communities. 1998. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1998:330:0032:0054:EN:PDF.
  12. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Basic information about glyphosate in drinking water. 2014. http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/glyphosate.cfm#four.
  13. Séralini G-E, Clair E, Mesnage R, et al. Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Environ Sci Eur. 2014;26(14). doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0014-5.
  14. Young F, Ho D, Glynn D, Edwards V. Endocrine disruption and cytotoxicity of glyphosate and roundup in human JAr cells in vitro. Integr Pharmacol Toxicol Genotoxicol. 2015;1(1):12-19.