Will Those Sneaky GMO Amendments Pass Because of an Underhanded Maneuver?
July 31, 2012http://www.anh-usa.org/will-sneaky-gmo-amendments-pass-through-an-underhanded-maneuver/
Not if we stop them!
As we reported a few weeks ago,
these amendments represent a sneaky, behind-closed-doors attempt to
make GMO foods immune from court review. Now we have learned of an even
sneakier, even more questionable legislative maneuver that might get
them passed.
The usual procedure for passing bills
in Congress is for the House to pass its version and the Senate to pass
its version. The two bills are reconciled by a joint conference
committee, and then both chambers pass the final bill.
The Senate has already passed its
version of the Farm Bill, the comprehensive omnibus bill that is the
primary agricultural and food policy tool of the federal government for
the next four or five years. The House version, which includes the
sneaky pro-GMO amendments, has run into trouble. We have learned that
the House Rules Committee has scheduled a hearing today (Tuesday, July
31) on a one-year extension of the 2008 Farm Bill—a Continuing
Resolution, or CR. If passed in the House (it will very likely fail in
the Senate), this will trigger a conference committee.
But here’s the dirty trick: the
conference committee won’t be reconciling the Senate bill with the
House’s CR. Instead, it will reconcile the Senate bill that passed, with
the House bill (including the bad amendments) that was never brought
before the full House, much less passed by the House! If this
illegitimate procedure is followed, the terrible GMO amendments could
get into the final bill. Once this bill is final, it will be too late to
strip out the amendments. The bill will pass.
There are a few pieces of legislation
that are considered “must pass,” usually appropriations bills. Riders
are often tacked onto these often unrelated bills in the hopes they’ll
be approved without any fuss, since the main bill is essentially assured
to pass.
This year, the powerful (and
exceedingly well-funded) biotechnology industry inserted three pro-GMO
amendments—two into the Farm Bill, and one into the Agriculture
Appropriations Bill. These riders are wide-ranging and could change the
face of the federal regulatory framework for genetically modified
organisms. Only a large and powerful grassroots effort can compete
against these riders.
This is the first time the GMO
industry has ever asked Congress for everything it wanted. (We like to
joke that they came just shy of asking for a magical unicorn!) The good
news is that they showed their hand, so we now know exactly what they
want and our allies in Congress know exactly what to watch out for.
The aforementioned Farm Bill riders
would outlaw any EPA review of a genetically engineered crop under the
Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act. This terrible
legislation would ensure that no agency other than the USDA (which is
decidedly pro-GMOs) will be allowed to provide analysis of the impacts
of GMO crops. Further, the riders also establish extremely short
deadlines for approval of GMOs. If the crops are not reviewed and
approved within the extremely short timeline, they would default to
immediate approval and commercialization.
Here’s where we stand now:
- The current Farm Bill is set to expire on September 30. However, as of this writing, the bill has not been scheduled for a floor vote.
- Our sense from our work on Capitol Hill is that the House leadership doesn’t want to bring the bill to the House floor because it won’t pass. This is mostly because of Republican infighting over the level of spending cuts in the bill.
- If the House passes the Continuing Resolution on the current (2008) Farm Bill—a CR in the Senate is likely to fail—a joint conference committee will be convened to reconcile the Senate’s version with these un-passed, un-debated, and most likely unnoticed GMO riders. It may be just another procedural bending of the rules for Congress, but we consider it to be an example of illegitimate legislative sleight-of-hand.
- Through this very tricky strategy the House bill won’t actually go on the floor for a vote, so our allies in the House won’t have any opportunity to strike the biotech riders by amendment. We are preparing for this eventuality—and we’re lobbying members of the conference committee.
Don’t let these riders sneak in through the back door without being debated and passed by the House! Please contact your representatives immediately and voice your objection to this rider. Take Action Now!
In addition, a third rider—the one attached to the Agricultural Appropriations bill—would, as we noted earlier this month,
strip federal courts of the authority to halt the planting of
genetically engineered crops while the USDA is still assessing their
environmental hazards. If this language stands, it will completely
undermine the judicial review process, and will encourage the unchecked
deregulation of GE crops despite terrible environmental and health
effects.
Here’s where we stand now:
- The bill has already been passed out of the House Agriculture Committee with the GMO language still intact.
- Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-OR) has agreed to offer an amendment to strike the GMO rider from the bill entirely—assuming the bill is actually heard on the floor.
- ANH-USA is lobbying members of the Agricultural Appropriations Committee, and so far Rep. DeLauro has committed her support for DeFazio’s amendment.
- We are also targeting the Blue Dog Coalition, especially Reps. Shuler and Barrow, who are leaders in the caucus. At the same time, we are approaching members of the Judiciary Committee to oppose the rider because it’s piggybacking on an appropriations bill rather than offering it as a separate bill on its own right, subject to open debate.
Urgent action is still needed—it’s
possible they’ll consider the appropriations bill this week before they
recess, so please send your messages today! However, after our meetings
on Capitol Hill it appears that the Agriculture Appropriations bill
will likely be dropped into a new omnibus spending bill to be considered
after the recess, in which case it is unlikely the GMO rider language
will be included. Unlikely, but not impossible—so please contact your congressional representative right away.
No comments:
Post a Comment